Kilian Feldbausch and Niels Visker will play each other in the qualifications of the Rovereto Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kilian Feldbausch who should win in 3 sets.
(image) As per the initial odds, Kilian Feldbausch is the pick to win this match.
Kilian Feldbausch -> 1.49
Niels Visker -> 2.47
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries – USA excluded).
(image) To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Prediction and head to head Kilian Feldbausch vs. Niels Visker
There is no head to head record between Kilian Feldbausch and Niels Visker since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Kilian Feldbausch
13 – 9win/loss
417
409
WLWLWWWLLL
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 13-9 | 0-0 | 11-8 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-17 | 4-2 | 20-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 6-10 | 1-1 | 1-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 417, Kilian got to the qualifications after defeating Filippo Romano 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, Kilian had a good straight sets win against Romano (6-4 6-2). During the match, Feldbausch scored 77 points vs Romano’s 58. The Swiss was extremely aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Feldbausch fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Kilian Feldbausch lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Feldbausch put 66% of his first serves in, winning 87% (34/39) of the points behind his 1st serve and 30% (6/20) on the 2nd serve. The Swiss broke Romano 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Feldbausch has a winning record in the last 4 years having won 54% of his matches (45-38). 2-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Feldbausch has a composed6-6 win-loss record in the last 4 years on indoor hard courts.
Feldbausch’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M15 Castellon.
Kilian has an aggregate 13-9 win-loss record in 2024, 2-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Rovereto Challenger
Kilian has never competed in this tournament before.
Niels Visker
47 – 27win/loss
527
496
WLWLLWWWLW
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 11-5 | 20-15 | 14-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 45-27 | 19-11 | 26-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 2-4 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 28-16 | 7-2 | 21-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-6 | 9-3 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 527, Niels reached the qualifications after beating Alberto Morolli 6-2 6-4.
In the qualifications, Visker had a good straight sets win against Morolli (6-2 6-4). During the match Visker scored 65 points vs Morolli’s 52. Niels was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about serving, Visker fired 4 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Niels Visker was pretty effective on serve to win 71% (24/34) of his 1st serve and 74% (17/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Niels broke Morolli 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Visker’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Sharm ElSheikh and M15 Antalya.
The Dutch has a composed 47-27 win-loss record in 2024, 14-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
1h:14
1h:12
1h:14
1h:12
1
1
18
18
2
2
77
65
77
65
34
24
34
24
44%
37%
2
4
2
4
2
0
2
0
34/39
24/34
87%
71%
6/20
17/23
30%
74%
4/10
3/5
4/10
3/5
40%
60%
3
2
3
2
1
0
1
0
2
2
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Feldbausch | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 |
| Pts | 77-58 | 65-52 |
| Total Points | 135 | 117 |
| Winners | 34 | 24 |
| %Winners | 44% | 37% |
Both Feldbausch and Visker played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Feldbausch and Visker have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (18). Feldbausch scored 34 winners (44% of the total points). On the other side, Visker struck 24 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Feldbausch | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4 |
| 1st in | 39/59 | 34/57 |
| %1st in | 66% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 34/39 | 24/34 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 6/20 | 17/23 |
| %2nd pts | 30% | 74% |
Feldbausch managed to score 2 aces . Visker bagged 4 aces . Feldbausch won 87% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 30% of the points. On the other side, Visker won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 74% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Feldbausch | Visker |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 3 |
| Converted | 4/10 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 40% | 60% |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 |
| Saved | 2 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Swiss broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. The Swiss conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Niels broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Visker was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Feldbausch | |||
| Q1 Romano |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 77-58 | 77-58 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 39/59 | 39/59 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 34/39 | 34/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/20 | 6/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 30% | 30% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Visker | |||
| Q1 Morolli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 65-52 | 65-52 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 34/57 | 34/57 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 24/34 | 24/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/23 | 17/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 74% | 74% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
(image)
(image)
WLWLWWWLLL
(image)
WLWLLWWWLW
2023
2022
Hard
I Hard
Clay
Carpet
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jules MarieMarie – August HolmgrenHolmgren (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey VatutinVatutin – Giovanni OradiniOradini (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Borna CoricCoric – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Vitaliy SachkoSachko – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles – Alexander RitschardRitschard (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Oleg PrihodkoPrihodko – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bogdan PavelPavel – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Giovanni FonioFonio – (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini – Federico ArnaboldiArnaboldi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-1) – H2H and prediction